Gladwyne Development goes before HARB

doran249's picture

The proposed development and demolition of 254 Righters Mill Rd., Gladwyne will be reviewed by the HARB at 8 a.m. on Tuesday Dec. 5, 2006, at the Township Building. This house is an 1880 Class 1 resource, and as such deserves to be watched very closely lest another Lower Merion historic asset meets the wrecking ball. This will be a precedent setting descision for the future of Lower Merion Historic Districts and Historic Resources. This is a classic profit vs. preservation bout that you won't want to miss and it will test the metal of this Township.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
SaveArdmoreCoalition's picture

Ok, so are you all going to go to the HARB meeting???

doran249's picture

The neighbors shall attend.

dmuth's picture

Bumped up to the front page.

SaveArdmoreCoalition's picture

Hi all. Feel free to jump in with additional comments.

As we hear it, the neighbors should be proud for a REALLY strong showing (we hear there was a need for lots of chairs). We were especially intrigued to hear that Lower Merion favorites, some members of the Liacouras family, were present. We hear the neighborhood message is crystal clear: they don't like this plan, don't support this plan. We also hear the neighbors presented a petition of some sort

Also as we hear it? No one from Lower Merion Conservancy was present, we assume due to scheduling conflicts because what is more important than this as far as Gladwyne goes, right?

As we hear it, HARB wants new owner of 254 Righters Mill Road to hire a historical architect.

As we hear it, owner of 254 Righters Mill Road and attorney didn't provide additional info to support their case for development of the property, is this true?

As we hear it, HARB will have a site visit during which time a representative of the neighbors group will also be present.

As we hear it, the neighbors group also submitted some sort of letter along with the petition regarding the history of the property. (can the neighbors post that position letter up here as a seperate post?)

As we hear it, someone attending the meeting says the development plans still resembles something best described as a "train of houses". Is this a case of "all aboard architecture"? Wouldn't this property development have to consider not only the front view but the view all the way around the property? What's that term? "Public view"?

So finally, in the "As we hear it", we won't hear a HARB opinion until sometime in the new year (2007), and then there is the Zoning Hearing Board to be revisited, right?

Maybe now would be a good time for the new owner not to be obdurate, but to consider an alternate plan like restoring "as is", or converting this Victorian gem back to it's originally intended single family glory???? We can only hope...and as we hear it, this is the season for miracles....

Final note, this recent editorial and this article, and this article all discuss this issue. Alternately you can search through this website.

SAC cares and we hope all of you do too!

doran249's picture

This was submitted to the HARB Dec. 5, 2006

An Explanation of the Historical Context of 254 Righters Mill Rd.
Gladwyne Historic District

The historical significance of the property as a whole should be urgently considered now that its existence is threatened.

The buildings on this property are more than just individual entities. They are linked together by a common historical bond which is the legacy left to the community by the historically significant family that lived there since 1880.

There Dr. George Winter and his wife Christiana Warner lived for a short time with their son Eugene Winter and daughter-in-law Anna Marie Blanche Porter. Dr. & Mrs. Eugene Winter had a daughter Ella Eugenia who married John Preston Stirk.* Their son, J. Clinton Stirk married Edna Lloyd and they had two children, Paul and Susan. So five generations of the same family have lived on this one property. This lineage has created a historic trail that has great value to the District. That trail remains in the form of the buildings that now exist.

All the buildings on the property are products of the family, and as such, should not be divided but considered as one historic resource. They grew out of the family’s wants and needs and they document that evolution. This is an integral family compound constructed over time by a family with 126 years of tenure. The buildings have a historical theme that grew as did the family, and together create local history. They should be treated and preserved as a whole, with the newest linked to the oldest and vice versa. All the buildings are a product of their time and no one part should be treated differently because of being from a different time. Once any part of the whole is destroyed the historical integrity will be lost forever.

According to the National Register of Historic Places a building of less that 50 years of age may be considered a contributing resource if certain measures are met. Per the building permit issued by Lower Merion Township, the 1961 cottage is an addition to a then existing 1 ½ story structure, the age of this existing building is unknown. Its occupancy is restricted, by that building permit, to a relative of a resident of the 1880 house, another ancestral and historical connection. The addition is a late example of the bygone bungalow style. It still retains its original 1950’s aqua color theme, and was built during the short Presidency of John F. Kennedy. The 1961 cottage mimics the style of the original 1880 house, and has “exceptional importance” by its ties to the culture and history of the District, the Winter and Stirk families and the Township. Until Clinton Stirk relocated, it housed his collection of one of the best archives of family and Gladwyne history in existence. It was a sort of secret-mini museum.

A building does not have to be grand to be exceptionally important. This family compound provides a sense of past and place, a wholly intact architectural record of District, Gladwyne, and Township history. Significance is not a rigid measure limited by time alone, but a subjective assessment made by experienced professionals. A District’s resources need not be homogenous, but can be diverse to represent an area’s development over time. All these buildings represent their own period in the District’s history and should all remain to bear witness to that history.

*Source: J. William and Marjorie Winter
New Bern, NC
(J. William Winter is the grandson Eugene Winter)

SaveArdmoreCoalition's picture

This week's Building and Planning has this little gem:

BUILDING AND PLANNING COMMITTEE
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
6:45 p.m. (Approximately)
Chairperson: Commissioner Elizabeth S. Rogan
Vice Chairperson: Commissioners Cheryl B. Gelber
George T. Manos

HISTORICAL COMMISSION

Demolition Permit

Consider a request to demolish the home and detached garage at 100 Maplehill Road, Gladwyne, Class 2.

On November 16, 2006, the Historical Commission recommended a 90-day delay in the issuance of the demolition permit. The Historical Commission recommends that the applicant have a design professional involved in historic preservation study the feasibility of preserving the house and also contact a house moving company to obtain an estimate to move the house. If the Board of Commissioners is satisfied that there is merit in the Commission’s recommendations, it can delay the demolition for a 90-day period. The 90-day period can be used to accomplish these recommendations.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.