Election is behind us, let's move on
Submitted by JohnN on Mon, 2007-11-12 17:01.
 |
Well, another election has passed us by and it is time to move on. So much to do, so much to do. Radnor Dems didn't do as badly as the press would make you believe. There were 7 open seats. If you consider that Hank's was unchallenged then there were only 6 races and we won 3 and came darn close in one other. Closer than most people know, I might add. Next year there will be many more races to help with and I will be out there helping. Bookmark/Search this post with: |
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati»
- JohnN's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Yes, let us look forward to the future instead of dwelling on the past.
Bumped to the front page.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkDmuth,
It is a free country, like you said! Why don't you post the original post you said you "Blocked". What gives you the right to block anyway...Free Speech you claim or it is only free when you are spewing your venom to hurt others. I would like to read it. MR Internet 101 everyone uses the public wifi you mentioned. Do not change the subject, you are a meglamaniac stalker and it shows. And do no try to deny the Nagle connection. You work for the guy and now you are giving him the Judas kiss?
Some advice DMuth, remove and stop the del.lili.cious defamatory posting. It would look better for you if you did! Del.lili.cious is going to block you anyway in the next 24 hours.
You are one sad excuse for a human being! Another insane picture of you :
http://www.claws-and-paws.com/node/144
OBTW you owe me an apology cyberstalker! Goodbye and good luck to you. You will reallly need it now!
- Login or register to post comments
permalink> Why don't you post the original post you said you "Blocked".
> What gives you the right to block anyway
Because this is the "Save Ardmore Coalition" website, not the "Pat C. is angry" website, that's why. The First Amendment merely guarantees you the right to say whatever you want -- it does not provide you with a venue in which to say it. This has been reaffirmed many times in court decisions, including AOL v. Cyberpromo and Compuserve v. Wallace.
> you are a meglamaniac stalker and it shows.
Uhhh... you're the one coming to our website, then going to my personal website, and you're trying to call ME a stalker? That word "stalker"... I do not think it means what you seem to think it means...
> And do no try to deny the Nagle connection. You work for the
> guy and now you are giving him the Judas kiss?
You seem awfully sure of that... where is the proof of this? I do not even know the gentleman.
> Some advice DMuth, remove and stop the del.lili.cious defamatory posting.
You're not clear on this whole "opinions are protected speech" thing, are you?
Here's how it works: I can say "Lisa Paolino sucks" as much as I like, and like all opinions, it is perfectly legal. The fact that she is an elected official underscores this--criticizing our government is a basic human right, and the hallmark of an open and free society.
> It would look better for you if you did!
Oh noes. Vague threats! What ever will I do?
> Another insane picture of you
You sure seem interested in pictures of me.
> Goodbye and good luck to you. You will reallly need it now!
Oh noes, another vague threat!
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkOne more demonstaration that Joseph or Jeremiah or Pat or whatever other name can't get the facts correct. SAC did not help me with my campaign, did not give me money or any in-kind help and no one associated with SAC worked the polls for me. Any comments on their blog were them expressing their personal opinions.
- Login or register to post comments
permalink