Things that make you go "Hmmmm" in Lower Merion....

SaveArdmoreCoalition's picture

In Ardmore we hear there was a very nice dinner the other night. We also hear that there was some sour grapes going on? After all this time, the more that changes, the more that stays the same?

What's up with that? If we don't sign on 110% to your vision of overly urbanizing Ardmore, we are still the devil incarnate, much as we were when we opposed eminent domain and beat it? Is it still a childish game of whomever gets all the toys wins?

Seriously, silly questions about what is IJ? (But we'll be nice and throw them a bone - www.IJ.org - if you can read you can learn....)

All in all we find it amusing that the same old people are still saying the same old things....snap out of it! You kids in an time warp or something? We LOVE Ardmore! We just don't love the idea of skyscrapers in Ardmore (or in the ROHO zone either). Our members are out and about and involved in the local Ardmore community, as well as the extended Lower Merion community. (If these kids got out more, they'd know all this already, poor kids.)

Speaking of out and about, we hear some things from Bryn Mawr. Is it true a 501(c)(3) was formed (or applied for) at the end of October to replace the Bryn Mawr Business Authority? In other words a business improvement district? So all those Bryn Mawr businesses that don't like paying modest dues are on board with the idea of assessments? Have the folks in Bryn Mawr hung with our friends in Ardmore at the AI to find out how it is done? Ardmore Initiative didn't happen overnight, and it took quite a bit of really hard work before it was born, so best of luck to them! This is very ambitious considering all that Bryn Mawr is dealing with.

Also, what do folks think if corporate sponsors for our shopping districts? We heard someone somewhere was checking into it? Do you as residents in your communities want a banner that says "Welcome to XYZ, Founded [insert year], Sponsored by ABC Corp"? Is that smart marketing or is it something not so Main Line? Would this be considered in very bad taste and not so Philadelphia Story?

Skipping right along, we have heard a LOT of input on the Ardmore RFP Process. If any of the 4 RFP submitters (the 5th wasn't an RFP)read this website we need to get the message clearly out to you that if you think Ardmore wants to be incredibly URBAN when we grow up and that we want buildings to go over the train tracks and that we want a new Main Street parallel to Lancaster Avenue, you are sadly mistaken. Also, NONE of you have said what you will do to make life bearable for businesses in Ardmore during redevelopment, and how you are going to get the property owners who don't exactly invest in their properties to clean up?

And all projects seem to say how they wish to coexist with Suburban Square, but none of you seem to say much of anything about the residential neighborhoods that border Main Street Ardmore. You can't just design your RFPs to satisfy the millionaire set, you have others to consider.

Have we mentioned we want the historic character of Ardmore to be preserved and we don't feel such a LARGE garage on Station Ave will do anything other then create a new traffic nightmare? Have we mentioned we might not all want a super modern design for the train station, and might find a design that captures the flavor of the original Victorian Era station?

Have we suggested you go to places like Media and downtown Wayne? Save those unattractive condos sprouting in Wayne, they have a wonderful downtown/Main Street in Wayne....and Media, well Media is the ideal downtown Main Street,the downtown Main Street other communities envy (and we hear there is only ONE nail salon along the main drag).

The Ardmore RFPs have great ideas in them, we just want to make sure all voices are heard, ok?

And then there is the River Trail. This is a great concept, just needs some kinks worked out, right? Like is there an alternative to walking alongside the Surekill Deathway? Yikes!

Ok enough wondering....participate in the future of this township - you can go to www.lowermerion.org to sign up for meeting notifications, check the upcoming meetings, send your commissioner an e-mail to let them know what's up in your neighborhood.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
elnmass's picture

Dear Friends in Ardmore,

I will be sending you some photos of our rare silver maple forest, which might sooon be felled under the swing of J.Brian O'Neill's axe. After many years (Cool of this regional battle, we are still finding it difficult to maintain stamina. On December 4th, our Conservation Commission will meet for a final decision. Here is a recent article of mine on various methods we have used in Belmont, Cambridge, Arlington to defeat the proposal of a 40B development (20 percent affordable housing).

Alewife Wetlands–Forest Ecosystem Continues Endangered Status
By Ellen Mass - Friends of Alewife Reservation

Town action concerning the fate of our regional silver maple forest has taken place at the Belmont Conservation Commission, where members are consulting the company of Horsley and Witten Inc.on the 300 unit project. We are close to permit stage. Commissioners question: restricted v. unrestricted hydraulic connections, natural flow, ground water levels, quantity and quality of storm water discharge, location, size and functioning of infiltration chambers, soil removal. They cite general inaccuracies, gaps, inadequate information., questions of the stormceptor system, size and location and backup of sewer storage system; and snow storage, to name a few. Construction or building plans to date are absent, yet permission is requested to begin clear cutting the trees.

Environmental issues are completely skirted in Epsilon assessments such as wildlife, lighting, noise and traffic. The Firm denies that bordering land subject to flooding is inescapably a part of a 25 plus acre wetland complex, owned by the Dept. of Conservation and Recreation in Cambridge, and includes the city’s largest wetlands. Five professional outside assessors’ reports have been ignored. www.friendsofalewifereservation.org contains the reports.

Epsilon ignores animal and bird land connectivity over a building footprint arc of 180 degrees. Julie Vondrak, assessor for wildlife, said that only 7 percent of wild and forest would be impacted from the 245 thousand square foot development which would house 800 plus persons in a gigantic 4 story building. Friends of Alewife Reservation has countered with studies of noted N.H. ecologist, Patrick Fairbairn, and assessments from wildlife specialist Dave Brown, who inventoried Middlesex Fells for the DCR producing a book, Biodiversity of the Alewife Reservation Area, which maps Uplands birds, wildlife, plants and insects

The Cambridge Conservation Commission began developing wetlands by-laws for years, but disappeared from consideration when new city appointed commissioners came aboard. Without municipal by-laws, Cambridge’s natural resources remain vulnerable. Forty percent of Ma. towns and cities have by-laws.

Financial and political pressure place on local and state government, and business has played a role in the proceedings. The Firm of nationally renowned developer, J. Brian O’Neill Sr., (Cambridge Partners Ltd.) from Pennsylvania, has lobbied the legislature, town, city and many participants. This Firm is the largest purchaser of Brown Fiends in the United States, developing luxury condos throughout New England and now plans the US east coast’s largest super luxury yacht marina. Rhode Island political scandals have rocked the Firm in recent years.

The Firm plans to fell a 7 acre rare forest (at least a thousand trees) leaving 2 trees from the forest on the building site. Some trees have been assessed at over 100 years.
.

Factors working in preservationists’ favor are the following: Coaltion to support the Belmont Uplands and Winn Brook Neighborhood,with support for Cambridge’s Democratic City Committee, has filed a civil action law suit with strong challenges of ecology, hydrology, sewage removal, and neighborhood protection, represented by Thomas Bracken Esq. The group claims the forest uplands is also filled in tidelands covered by Chapter 91 noting that the hydrology of the area continues somewhat as it did 200 years ago and thus conforms to the latest ch 91 legislative changes..

Rep.Will Brownsberger’s legislative initiative (H.B. 21) to purchase the Uplands for 6 million dollars from the Environmental Bond Bill, is now supported by 12 legislators in Middlesex and Suffolk Counties along the Mystic River watershed.

Preserving the Alewife woodlands remains a Conservation Commission matter (soon to reach Cambridge’s Commission), a civil action suit, and a legislative initiative that is directed to the Governor’s office. More advocacy with local decision-makers is needed. Write Councilors and Commissioners to prevent the removal of Belmont-Cambridge woodlands. A region-wide Solstice Service will be held with 3 ministers of 3 towns on the Reservation December 16th at 2:00pm at the Alewife Reservation parking lot on Acorn Park Drive in Discovery Park on the Cambridge-Belmont border.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.