Bryn Mawr lost Dunkin' Donuts at the end of 2007. Currently under discussion is converting the existing structure to a bank. Please read the following excerpt from Lower Merion Township's memo on the concept which was recently presented for discussion at the January 8th Planning Commission Meeting:

SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 733 W. Lancaster Avenue, Bryn Mawr SD# 3603, Ward 4.
Proposal
The applicant, Citizens Bank, is seeking comments on the proposal to:
• Construct two additions totaling 658 square foot addition to the existing Dunkin’ Donuts building;
• Construct a drive-through lane with two points-of-service;
• Reconfigure the parking lot, including the removal of thirteen (13) parking spaces; and
• Waiver of Tentative Sketch Plan requirements.

Rear of Dunkin Donuts

The proposal is illustrated on the accompanying set of plans that includes five (5) sheets, prepared by Nave Newell, Inc. dated October 25, 2007, last revised December 20, 2007....The County recognized that the proposed plan meets the current C-2 zoning requirements but does not meet the Bryn Mawr village zoning the Township has been discussing. The County noted that the proposal is not pedestrian friendly, in that the building is located more than fifty (50’) feet from the sidewalk and caters to vehicular traffic with the drive-through lanes. The County suggests that the applicant provide additional landscaping along the right-of-way to make the streetscape more pedestrian friendly.

Front/Side of Dunkin Donuts

The County also noted that the two driveways accessing Lancaster Avenue are unsafe and strongly suggested that the driveway closest to Town Place be removed altogether or, at a minimum be angled in order to discourage east-bound traffic from turning left into the property. The County also noted that vehicular traffic entering the site at this point may come into conflict with handicap drivers backing out of designated handicap parking spaces....When this project first appeared before the Land Development Committee, it was suggested that the applicant investigate ways of making the building more pedestrian friendly and reduce the potential for vehicular conflicts. Staff suggested that the applicant investigate demolishing the existing building and construct a new building closer to the street. In response, the applicant stated that the terms of the lease are based on renovating the existing site.

This post is informative and the opinions are just that, opinions. It is not a condemnation per se of the project, only the prospect raises serious questions:

1. How many banks do we need? How many retail branches of the same brand do we need? What is the actual need in the community since so many folks bank online or patronize a physical bank branch occasionally?

12. Have any of you out there ever run into traffic issues with the neighboring stores and their lot? You know, Staples or even the crazy traffic at Starbucks across Lancaster?