Graffiti Ordinance and Giving Credit Where Credit is Due

SaveArdmoreCoalition's picture

So... the other week the Board of Commissioners discussed the proposed amendment(s) to the Graffiti Ordinance at a public meeting.
Ardmore PA Feb 25 2008 046

The ordinance amendment(s) is a good step although slightly unrealistic - you don't have to go to just Mapes or whatever in Ardmore to buy spray paint, and requiring owners to clean up graffiti on their properties within 5 days, while admirable is unrealistic. What if a property owner is out of town or lives out of town? What if they are ill or infirmed or handicapped?
April 14 2008 003
The idea of getting graffiti cleaned up shouldn't be making victims (property owners) criminals. Then it just becomes about generating revenue.

In many major metropolitan cities, including Philadelphia, if you check you will find property owners are given at least 10 days to get graffiti cleaned up. That is reasonable.

Also, what was not mentioned during this discussion was the citizen initiative which undoubtedly provoked this conversation in the first place. Efforts of people like Ardmore Clean Up Group and Save Ardmore Coalition, in particular.

Ardmore Clean Up gets people together and cleans up the streets of Ardmore. They are fostering a new sense of community while they are at it. For a very long time now, SAC has been proactive when it comes to combatting graffiti. We photograph and notify folks about graffiti. We offer to assist with painting over graffiti. Our group President, Sharon Eckstein, for one, has spent hours of her personal time reaching out to property owners on this topic. It is her vision to not only perhaps get graffiti offenders to clean up their mess when caught, but to channel their efforts in a more positive manor. As a group, we are very intrested in a mural arts program.

It's just a simple request really: give SAC and Ardmore Clean Up Group a little bit of public kudos. We've been at this particular thing a long time. And we have had successes we can attribute to our efforts...

Posted on Tue, Jul 1, 2008
Township on mission to clean up graffiti
By Cheryl Allison

Just as there are gateway drugs, there are gateway crimes, Lower Merion police say, and graffiti is one of them.Now the township is considering new regulations intended to keep that door closed as tight as possible.

At their meeting July 2, Lower Merion commissioners were to consider advertising an amendment to the township's Anti-Graffiti Ordinance that would set new requirements for stores selling the materials of graffiti.
Clean Up Needed Ardmore PA
Another new section of the ordinance would require owners or occupants of properties where graffiti appears to quickly remove the markings.

Lower Merion Township has had an anti-graffiti ordinance on the books for many years, at least since the 1970s, said police Superintendent Joseph Daly. That's when the activity was a plague in communities in many areas of the country, Daly said.

Bryn Mawr PA Summer 2008 Graffiti Next to Bejing Inn
To the Editor

This past week Lower Merion Police Chief Joe Daly proposed an amendment to the commissioners regarding the existing graffiti ordinance, for which each and every commissioner voted to further pursue the amendment through public notice.

The ordinance states that you must be 18 years of age to purchase spray paint or indelible markers, and that merchants must lock these items up and post at the cash register that these items can only be purchased by a person of age.

Let’s forget for a moment that this will do nothing to stop those who wish to commit property crimes with spray paint as they can order a greater selection at a cheaper price over the Internet. Just Google “graffiti supplies” and you will see 296,000 choices, many with no credit card needed.

Let’s also forget for a moment that this places yet another unnecessary bureaucratic burden on business owners.

Of greatest concern to me is the fact that property owners in Lower Merion will now be fined a substantial amount of money if they do not remove graffiti from their property within five days. This seems to be an extremely short period of time, and especially so for those who are on vacation.

This strikes me as a back-door tax.....Andy Meyers, Lower Merion

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
lmwatcher's picture

There is a time and place for government to do its own thing, there is a time and place for the government to work with constituents (which is the majority of the time), and there is a time and place for government to get out of the way.

It appears to me that SAC and Ardmore Clean Up Group have been doing what has made this country so great. That being citizens getting involved and taking problems into their own hands and solving them.

Why the L.M. commissioners felt they just had to take control of this situation is beyond me. To me, control is about power.

While I don't know all the details of how the two civic groups are going about cleaning up graffiti, would it not have made sense for the commissioners to have reached out to them and find a way to work together as opposed to just making more laws?

This resident of Lower Merion gives kudos and thanks to SAC and Ardmore Clean Up Group.

SaveArdmoreCoalition's picture

Thank you LMWatcher. Here is an update from Cheryl Allison of Main Line Life:

Posted on Wed, Jul 23, 2008
Graffiti ordinance: Tag, you're out in LM
Beefed-up regulations target vandals and, inadvertently, victims of graffiti crimes
By Cheryl Allison

Lower Merion now has some new tools to fight the blemish of graffiti in its communities.Township commissioners last week voted to adopt an ordinance aimed both at preventing graffiti and at making sure it is cleaned up quickly if it does appear in business areas and neighborhoods.

Police Superintendent Joseph Daly recommended beefing up the town-ship's anti-graffiti regulations, citing a recent upsurge of vandalism in some areas including Ardmore and Bryn Mawr. Graffiti is a "gateway crime," he told commissioners. Left unchecked to mar communities, it can symbolize decline and decay, and create "an environment that encourages further acts of vandalism and crime," in the words of the ordinance.

Commissioners last week also credited community groups such as the Ardmore Clean-Up Group and Save Ardmore Coalition with bringing the emerging problem to officials' attention, and for their efforts as volunteers to work with property owners to clean up graffiti.

Lower Merion has long had an anti-graffiti ordinance, including a prohibition on the sale of the materials of graffiti to minors.

The new amendments to that ordinance approach the problem in two ways. They both carry some new responsibilities for merchants and property owners. It was a new requirement for property owners to clean up graffiti that raised some concerns with the changes, and led some to suggest that the township might, in effect, be punishing the victim.

The ordinance already prohibited the sale of spray paint or indelible markers to persons under the age of 18 and required storeowners to either display the materials in an "enclosed device" or store them out of sight. Now they will be required to place signs in display areas stating that damaging public or private property with graffiti is a crime, subject to prosecution. They will also be required to post signs in view of cashiers stating that it is a violation of law to sell the materials to persons under 18, unless they are accompanied by a parent or guardian.

The other set of new provisions give the township authority to enforce removal of graffiti, ensuring that it doesn't remain in public view. Owners or occupants of properties will be required to remove graffiti within five days of notice by the township. If the markings are not removed during that period, the township could remove or paint over them, assessing the cost to the property. Extensions of the period for removal can be granted, based on weather conditions and some other reasons.

To Haverford resident Andy Meyers, who was opposed to the changes, that requirement "makes criminals out of crime victims."

Commissioner Cheryl Gelber was worried that the five-day requirement is too stringent, and suggested extending it to 10 days. She cast the sole "no" vote on adoption, based on that concern.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.