FOR REPUBLICANS ONLY -Rick Santorum, Not the Guy for President - DIABLO Pro Life Big Government, Union Financed, Earmarker -
- Access to all of our posts and comments
- Your own profile including an avatar, buddy lists, and other social networking features
- The ability to send private messages to other users on this site
- The ability to chat and interact with other citizens and voters in and around Lower Merion.
(Don't live in Lower Merion? That's okay. We won't hold it aginst you.)
 |
Here are my 21 reasons: posted at The Liberty Blog www.thelibertyblog.org in southeastern Pennsylvania. Rick Santorum’s 21 Negatives: http://thelibertyblog.org/tag/rick-santorum Rick “Elmer Gantry” Santorum is a phony conservative: Rick Santorum is a Pro Life Big Government Earmarking Union Financed DIABLO, (Democrat In All But Label), and who cannot win his erstwhile home state Pennsylvania and there are good reasons for that. What, exactly, is the difference between Bob Casey and Rick Santorum? Rick Santorum is Bob Casey Lite without Bob Casey's good nature.
Rick Santorum cannot be trusted with money.Rick Santorum is a GWBush Big Government Republican. Rick Santorum would pick different winners and losers than the Obama Administration but he accepts the Big Government as inevitable. Rick Santourm's Big Spending Big Debt Expanding Government record tells us that Rick Santorum will not adopt fiscally responsbile debt or deficit policies to avoid national bankruptcy. Rick Santorum has never had a private sector job of any kind and has not business experience of any kind. Rick Santorum is a product of government: the US Congress formed his political policies and views. When job creation and growing the economy are core issues, Rick Santorum has no record of accomplishment. Rick Santorum would pick different winners and losers than the Obama Administration but he accepts the Big Government as inevitable. Rick Santorum has never had a private sector job of any kind and has not business experience of any kind. Rick Santorum is a product of US Congress. As to social issues, he’d just be forcing a different social agenda (while spending our tax money). We need someone who will reverse the damage done, fiscally and socially, by the Obama Leftist, Socialist Welfare Statist policies, not someone will do the same thing in a different way. I want to limit the size of government, decrease spending, reduce the debt and deficit, and have major tax reform and a pro-growth, job creating agenda. Rick Santorum gives us no reason to think he will do any of these things. |
- bobguzzardi's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Obama Leftist, Socialist Welfare Statist policies
How are we supposed to have a serious conversation with that as a premise?
What would make you think I want to have a discussion with you? What would be the point? Do I delude myself in thinking that I could convince you about any non Liberal Constitutional Limited Government Economic Freedom policy? FYI there are 1000s of other readers of this blog? Do I have any illusions that you would ever consider voting Republican? or even not voting Democrat?
Or agreeing with any of limited government fiscal policy prescriptions about anything. You don't even acknowledge the fiscal threat of Mandatory Entitlement Spending to the national budget and the economy. Your view is that the "rich" are not paying their "fair share", however much that may be.
Your view is that Sarah Palin and her ilk in the Tea Party are the Republican Party and they are stupid bigots.Correct me if I am wrong? I, certainly, don't recall that you defended her against any attacks.Have I missed a post where you have have been laudatory of anyting Sarah Palin, or even Rick Perry, has said.
Isn't Obama a Leftist? Is not his 2012 campaign a Marxist Alinsky Class Warfare attack on the Haves and the Wealth and Job Creators?
Is it not a campaign exploiting envy and resentment against the greedy, selfish, heatless "the rich 1% "?
Does not the Obama Agenda promote a Eurpoean, Statist, socialist, wealth redistributionist policies, explicitly?
Have not the "Green Subsidies" from the Department of Energy been 'privileging' his campaign corporatist allies?
The Democrats had control of House and Senate from 2007 to 2011 and control of House, Senate and Presidency from 2009 to 2011 and the signature issue was Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a government takes over of health care in the US. Debt and Deficit and Spending has taken more and more of private sector domestic production and yet more people are out of work than ever before.
Even Liberal Democrat Jim Cramer warns of the job crushing, economically depressing consequences of Obamacare on Morning Joe: ObamaCare is JobKiller says Democrat Donor Mad Money's Jim Cramer; CEO's are paralyzed when it comes to job hiring, because of Obamacare.(13 February 2012 Washington Examiner Charles Spiering).
bobguzzardi on Mon, 2012-02-13 05:38
Obama Leftist, Socialist Welfare Statist policies
Hugh Gordon 2012-02-14 00:00
How are we supposed to have a serious conversation with that as a premise?
BINGO!! Hugh.
And the same kind of fog, that qualifies as no more than ultracon misleading and often alarmist propaganda, keeps being thrown up at SAC in blog after blog.
In response, SAC's serious, thoughtful bloggers take major time to keep correcting statements in them. And even when the ultracon premise of the blog, which often is highlighted in a reader-byte blog title, is acknowledged to be misleading by the blogger, he won't retract it when asked to.
A couple recent examples:
- "Yikes Al Gore Is Wrong - The Earth Is Not Warming MET and East Anglia" Submitted by bobguzzardi on Sun, 2012-01-29 14:56
- "Marcellus Shale and Fracking Hyteria [sic]" // Submitted by bobguzzardi on Thu, 2012-02-09 11:44
And here's a piece de resistance of a misleading blog title. Notably, it followed the correction marathons by SAC's serious bloggers in response to the above two.
- "Bankrupting America, the web site - the Number are the Numbers - An Informed Voter Is My Ally" Submitted by bobguzzardi on Thu, 2012-02-09 15:07
bobguzzardi asks:
Do I delude myself in thinking that I could convince you about any non Liberal Constitutional Limited Government Economic Freedom policy?
Do I have any illusions that you would ever consider voting Republican?
Given your above aims, you might consider this possibility, BobG: The more you continue to post false and misleading "information" here at SAC to support your opinions, the more likely you undermine your deep wish to create converts among SAC readers to your ultracon positions and candidates of preference. Continuing to paper SAC with new blog threads, without taking time to be careful to maintain the credibility of what you say in them, likely is a low payoff use of your partisan missionary zeal.
Would I right in thinking that "true and accurate " information would be information you agree with?
Even Climate scientists made wrong predictions about the measured decline in temperature over past 13 years and still have not offered any explanation why the computer models were wrong. So I am not in bad company.
You are making the mistake of thinking that I am writing for you. There are 1000s of other readers. Some might think I have a point.
Clue, BobG: Relying on venomous, "don't tread on me," rhetoric like this isn't likely to yield you much credibility or many converts either:
Tue, 2012-02-14 10:08 #4 bobguzzardi
Is not [Obama's] 2012 campaign a Marxist Alinsky Class Warfare attack on the Haves and the Wealth and Job Creators?
Scanning your posts can be like watching Super PAC Farce tv ads.
Even extremist, racist, homophobic, sexist, nativist right wing nuts have feelings, too, don't you know? 
Perhaps it would be preferable for Guzzardi's critics to stick-to-the-issues; the alternative is that he "wins" by default.
I elaborate on Santorum's problems here:
http://www.redstate.com/rsklaroff/2012/02/07/santorum-redux/
Duly noted.
The Bob changed its merged mind. Santorum was one of your guys, like Rick Perry, but isn't any more.
From: "Welcome to BobGuzzardi.com. . ." website
In 2006 - 2007, Bob enthusiastically supported and contributed $230,000 to the following candidates and races (to name a few) with the purpose of advancing the agenda of Limited Government, Individual Liberty and Economic Freedom.
U.S. Senate
Jim DeMint for U.S. Senate, South Carolina Pat Toomey for U.S. Senate Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) Steve Laffey (R-RI) Mark Kennedy (R-MN) Jim Talent (R-MO)
Now, The Bob Machine is moved to do all it can to make sure that other Americans leave Rick S. behind too. Got it, got it, got it here at SAC. Roger. You've been read.
Possibility: It might be that bobguzzardi's self-described devotion to enlightening others and turning them on by wielding idea power has succeeded as well as it can on the aim to undo Santorum by appropriating the Save Ardmore Coalition website as a bully pulpit, and has veered into the risky realm of boringly, annoyingly using somebody else's website to beat an idea into a dead horse.
About Me [bobguzzardi]
Bob supports a number of conservative candidates and causes for their emphasis on supply side economics (including effective tax cuts) and strong defense of Israel. Bob is a politically and socially active man who believes that ideas have power. This power is necessary to convey messages and form groups that will help educate and enlighten others.
LMT conveniently forgets that the current competition is focused on choosing a GOP nominee; Guzzardi has supported Conservative candidates against Democrats.
This is so intuitive that it's surprising his credibility would be open to challenge.
LMT is invited to "put his $ where his mouth is"...or not begrudge Guzzardi for having "walked the talk" so courageously as he has consistently done.
And yes, I am the "new best friend" mentioned in that post.
Fecal jokes aside, blog.spreadingsantorum.com has pretty good coverage on Santorum.
How to Tell if Your Cat is Plotting to KILL YOU